Breaking Down the Recruiting Brick Wall: Evaluating & Selecting Candidates

This article is the last in a three-part series looking at how your organization can improve its hiring processes. Just joining us? Read parts one and two to learn about creating your success profile and sourcing candidates for your positions.


In Post 2 in our series “Breaking Down the Recruiting Brick Wall: How to Build More Effective Hiring Practices,” we shared a few active ways to go beyond your standard job postings and effectively source and recruit the right candidates for your organization.


Now that you know how to identify the top candidates for your pipeline, how will you evaluate them properly in order to make the best hire possible?


To assess candidates, your organization may follow standard practices such as reviewing resumes to look for at least the minimum qualifications; bringing qualified candidates through an interview process; or conducting reference checks with candidates’ former employers.


Many organizations often believe using one or two of these practices will be enough to decide whether a candidate is the right fit. But, rather than relying on a face-to-face interview or a reference check, putting together all of these practices (and more) will better allow you to gain a truer picture of who a candidate really is and how they will fit in at your organization. 


Today we’ll help you take your core candidate evaluation practices to the next level and show you how to combine interviews, reference checks and other assessment tools to increase your chances of making a great hire.

Combining Assessment Tools to Evaluate & Select Candidates

Remember Your Candidate Success Profile

Before you begin evaluating candidates, refer back to the Candidate Success Profile we discussed in Post 1 to know what to look for when reviewing resumes, what to address with interview questions, etc. Like with the other steps in your hiring process, using the Success Profile as the foundation for your assessment process will ensure you choose the candidate with the right hard and soft skills needed in order to succeed in the role.


Nail the Interview

How would you rate your interview process? How would candidates rate it? A strong and consistent interview strategy is critical in evaluating candidates. Here are a few things to consider when putting yours together.


The Interview Team

Who from your organization will interview candidates? Should candidates meet with everyone in the first round, or will interviewers meet with candidates at different stages of the process? And will the interviews be cross-functional, or will candidates only meet with members of the hiring department? 


Decide on the size and scope of your interview team at the beginning of the process, and follow the same interview structure and schedule with each candidate you bring through the interviews.


Maintaining a consistent interview team makes it easier to ensure that everyone involved in this stage understands the needs of the role and the qualifications you are seeking in a candidate. Logistically, keeping your interview team consistent can also make scheduling interviews go more smoothly, which will help you move quickly with candidates and maintain search momentum.


The Interview Questions

Use your Success Profile to develop questions that address the key areas you’ve identified that a candidate will need to excel in this role. Consider assigning specific skillsets for individual interviewers to focus on based on their respective areas. For example, a member of your finance team could assess the candidate’s analytical competence while a human resources professional evaluates cultural fit. You should also make sure to keep questions open-ended.


Ultimately, you want to design questions that will prompt candidates to provide specific examples relating back to the Success Profile or allowing you to observe their skills in action. Below is an example of what we’re talking about.

How you word your interview questions is crucial in eliciting an answer that gives you a better picture of the candidate’s views and working styles. In the scenario above, the word “control” baits the candidates, enabling you to figure out if and how they are able to partner across functions within your organization.



Scenario-Based Work Examples

Another way to evaluate candidates’ fit during the interview process is to assign a project to complete prior to your in-person meeting with them. These scenario-based work examples allow you to assess hard and soft skills that may be challenging to evaluate with questions alone.


For example, if filling a marketing position, you could ask candidates to develop a go-to-market strategy for a new product launch to present at their in-person interview. An assignment like this can allow you to see not only how candidates think strategically and creatively but also their ability to present to a leadership team.


Remember that these assignments or projects should also be based on the Success Profile; if “strong presentation skills” are not a key area you outlined, developing a way to evaluate this attribute would be irrelevant to your interview process.


2 More Tools to Help You Determine Who the Candidate Is


Psychometric Assessments

Many of our clients use assessments such as DiSCPersonalysisMBTI and StrengthsFinder as evaluation tools when selecting new team members.

These tools measure an array of individual attributes, including behavior & personality, skills & competencies, emotional intelligence, motivators and values. And they aren’t just used for recruiting and hiring; many assessment suites include tests that address individual development & team building, job analysis & benchmarking, performance management and more.


Psychometric assessments can be valuable to an organization’s development and people management strategies, but they are more effective when you invest in them across your organization; rather than using an assessment for a single hire, you should adopt it for all current and new employees in order to assess your organization as a whole and maintain consistency going forward.


You will also need a trained facilitator to administer the test and interpret the results. If you aren’t ready to commit internal resources yet, engage a consultant who specializes in one or more assessment tools to oversee this process.

At 180one, we are big fans of incorporating these types of tests into your overall assessment approach, but remember that these tools are just one piece of your entire evaluation process and should not be considered “hire or not hire” tests.


Reference Checks

Most organizations conduct reference checks during the hiring process, but do you know how to make the references you receive more effective in assessing a candidate? Here are a couple of tips to help you improve your reference checks.


Ask the candidate for the right references.
The quality and reliability of your reference checks rely first on where the references come from. Again, refer back to your Success Profile as a reminder for exactly what you are looking for and determine who you need to talk to in order to learn more about how a candidate satisfies those key areas.


Hiring for a leadership position? Conduct a “360 Review” by having candidates provide you someone they report to, someone who reports to them and someone who is a peer to them to serve as references.


Rather than the candidate selecting the references to check, you could also specifically ask to speak to a former boss at ABC Company; how the candidate responds to this request will also be very telling in evaluating their fit for your organization.


Ask the references the right questions.
Like with interview questions you ask a candidate, questions for reference checks require finessing in order to draw out responses that will be useful in evaluating the candidate.


Need to know in what areas a candidate may be weak? Rather than asking, “What is the candidate’s biggest weakness?” ask a reference, “How can we help develop the candidate?” for a more honest and authentic response.


Putting All of the Pieces Together

After collecting information about your candidates through various channels (resumes, interviews, assessments, references, etc.), how do you use that data to help you make a hiring decision?


A pragmatic approach to evaluate candidates consists of developing a simple ranking system to see how their skills and fit stack up.


Create a Candidate Assessment Scoring Matrix and rank every candidate using a numeric scale on how well they meet the criteria laid out in your Success Profile.


Make sure you have the evidence to support your rankings, though. If you didn’t assess a candidate’s leadership qualities in the interview, psychometric assessment or reference check, for instance, do not assume that they are a leader just because they have that title at their current organization.


Here is an example of a simple Scoring Matrix to give you an idea.

In the end, you want to feel confident in your hiring decision, and laying all of the information you gathered out in a Scoring Matrix will take the guesswork out of deciding whether a candidate is the best choice for the role and for your organization.


A Final Recap of the “Breaking Down the Recruiting Wall” Series

Much of the conversation about what makes a company successful today centers on one main thing: its people. But, while hiring and cultivating top talent is a priority for most organizations, many companies still lag behind when it comes to investing in sourcing, recruiting and assessing new candidates.


Over the past few months, 180one has provided insight into the marketplace and tips and strategies for how to up-level your company’s hiring practices so you can start “walking the walk” and investing more in your people.


After reading the “Breaking Down the Recruiting Brick Wall” series, you are now equipped to:

  • Build a strong foundation for your recruiting and hiring processes by knowing what you’re looking for when it comes to the ideal candidate for a position and your organization
  • Take a more active and creative approach to sourcing new talent by posting jobs more strategically, leveraging the media to promote your open positions, targeting specific candidates & companies and more
  • Redevelop your assessment process to more accurately evaluate and select the right candidates for your organization


Of course, elevating your entire hiring process may sound like a daunting task, but this is why the retained recruiting industry exists. For organizations that aren’t ready to overhaul their systems or don’t have all of the pieces in place yet internally, a retained search firm like 180one can provide the resources, experience and know-how to find the candidates who will succeed in the most challenging roles.


Ultimately, your people are your best asset, so there is no reason why you shouldn’t start investing in finding the right professionals for your organization today.

By Greg Togni July 6, 2026
For years, professional sports have embraced a familiar philosophy: collect enough star talent, and success will follow. Yet season after season, teams with the most recognizable names often fall short of expectations, while less glamorous rosters outperform them through cohesion, trust, and a shared commitment to a common goal. The New York Knicks have taken a different approach. Rather than simply pursuing the biggest available names, the organization has reunited several former Villanova teammates, players who won together in college and developed a reputation for selflessness, accountability, and relentless work ethic. While each player has grown into an accomplished professional in his own right, what makes this group particularly compelling isn't just individual talent. It's the chemistry they already possess. That story should resonate far beyond basketball.  It highlights a lesson every CEO, board member, and hiring executive should consider- organizations don't win because they collect the most impressive résumés. They win because they build leadership teams whose strengths complement one another and whose shared values create trust long before adversity arrives. Talent Opens the Door. Chemistry Sustains Success. Executive hiring often begins with a search for credentials. Companies look for executives with exceptional track records, marquee employers, prestigious degrees, or transformational accomplishments. Those qualifications matter. They establish credibility and demonstrate capability. But they don't guarantee success. Every executive search firm has witnessed situations where an outstanding individual hire struggled to create the expected impact. The issue wasn't competence. It was fit. Leadership styles clashed. Decision-making became slower. Collaboration suffered. Instead of elevating the executive team, the new addition unintentionally created friction. Contrast that with leadership teams that seem to move almost effortlessly. Conversations are candid. Decisions happen quickly. Disagreements remain productive because trust already exists. These teams aren't successful because everyone thinks alike. They're successful because they understand one another's strengths, respect differing perspectives, and share a common commitment to the organization's mission. The Nova Knicks illustrate this principle in action. Their familiarity wasn't built overnight. Years of competing together established communication patterns, mutual accountability, and confidence in one another's decision-making. Those qualities can't be replicated simply by assembling talented individuals. The same is true inside the executive suite. Culture Is More Than a Buzzword Organizations frequently discuss culture during the hiring process, but culture is often misunderstood. Culture isn't ping-pong tables, flexible work schedules, or carefully crafted mission statements. At the leadership level, culture is reflected in how executives make decisions, manage conflict, communicate under pressure, and support one another when circumstances become difficult. One executive who prioritizes transparency can influence an entire leadership team. Conversely, one leader who operates independently or places personal success above organizational goals can undermine months, or even years of progress. This doesn't mean companies should seek leaders who all share identical backgrounds or personalities. Diversity of thought remains one of the strongest drivers of innovation. However, diversity works best when it rests on a foundation of shared values: integrity, accountability, respect, and a willingness to collaborate. That's the distinction between similarity and chemistry. The former limits organizations. The latter strengthens them. Hiring for the Team, Not Just the Role One of the most overlooked questions in executive hiring isn't, "Can this candidate do the job?" It's "How will this individual make everyone around them better?" Great coaches ask this question constantly. They don't simply evaluate statistics or highlight reels. They consider how each player fits the existing roster, complements teammates, and contributes to the team's identity. Business leaders should adopt the same mindset. When evaluating executive candidates, organizations should certainly assess experience, technical expertise, and strategic vision. But they should also evaluate how candidates build relationships, navigate disagreement, influence peers, and foster trust across the organization. The highest-performing executives don't simply deliver results themselves. They create an environment where others perform at a higher level. That multiplier effect is often what separates good leadership teams from exceptional ones. Building a Championship Leadership Team The most successful organizations rarely rely on a collection of individual stars. Instead, they intentionally build leadership teams capable of sustaining success over time. That requires looking beyond résumés and considering factors that are harder to measure but equally important: Does this leader strengthen our culture? Will they earn the trust of peers and direct reports? Can they challenge ideas without creating unnecessary conflict? Do they make those around them more effective? These questions don't replace traditional hiring criteria; they enhance them. As executive recruiters, we often remind clients that leadership is not an individual sport. Every executive appointment reshapes the dynamics of the leadership team. Each new hire either reinforces collaboration or introduces friction. The goal isn't simply to find the most accomplished executive available; it's to find the executive who will help the entire organization perform at its highest level. The Final Takeaway The attention surrounding the Nova Knicks isn't really about basketball. It's about something every successful organization strives to achieve: building a team whose collective performance exceeds the sum of its individual parts. Championships, in sports and in business, are rarely won by talent alone. They're earned by leaders who trust one another, communicate openly, embrace accountability, and elevate everyone around them. When organizations approach executive hiring with that philosophy, they're no longer just filling leadership positions. They're building a championship team.
By Effie Zimmerman June 23, 2026
Group Vice President ABOUT THE COMPANY The E-J Group is active in all facets of electrical contracting, bringing experience, expertise, and a national reputation to projects that range in size up to more than $900 million. With over 4,000 employees across 32 offices nationwide, E-J delivers full-service electrical solutions for mission critical / data centers, rail systems, transit facilities, office buildings, hospitals, power generation, substations, transmission and distribution, renewables, co-generation facilities, roadway and outdoor specialty work, airports, industrial facilities, chip plants, universities, sports stadiums, extra high voltage distribution, utility, and gas infrastructure. At E-J, three generations of family expertise have built an organization that combines practical knowledge with modern technological innovation, providing rapid and efficient solutions for today’s lighting, power, energy, and communication needs. E-J has a 127-year reputation for integrity, quality, and exceptional service in the electrical field. To learn more, visit www.ej1899.com . POSITION SUMMARY The Group Vice President will oversee and manage all operational aspects of this $750 million group of business units spread across multiple states. The responsibilities will encompass strategic planning, process optimization, and ensuring efficient day-to-day operations as well as growing staff and development of people. With a focus on continuous improvement, you will drive operational excellence, fostering a culture of innovation and productivity. Travel at least 40% of any given month to cover the needs of a national electrical contractor, reporting directly to the Executive Vice President responsible for both local and national management. KEY RESPONSIBILITIES Operational Leadership Lead and oversee operations across multiple divisions, regions, and business units nationwide. Develop and execute operational strategies that align with the company's growth objectives, financial goals, and customer commitments. Establish operational standards, performance metrics, and accountability systems to drive consistency and excellence across all divisions. Monitor project execution, productivity, labor utilization, scheduling, quality, and customer satisfaction. Drive continuous improvement initiatives focused on efficiency, scalability, and profitability. Financial Performance Maintain full P&L accountability for assigned divisions and operational business units. Partner with division leadership to develop annual budgets, forecasts, and strategic growth plans. Monitor key financial metrics, including revenue, gross margin, EBITDA, backlog, cash flow, and working capital. Identify opportunities to improve operational efficiency, project margins, and return on investment. Review major project performance and implement corrective actions where necessary. Strategic Growth Support corporate growth initiatives, including geographic expansion, acquisitions, and new market development. Collaborate with business development and estimating teams to ensure strategic pursuit of opportunities aligned with organizational objectives. Participate in acquisition due diligence, integration planning, and operational alignment of acquired businesses. Evaluate market trends, competitive positioning, and emerging technologies impacting the electrical construction industry. Safety and Risk Management Champion a world-class safety culture throughout the organization. Ensure compliance with all OSHA, regulatory, and company safety standards. Partner with safety leadership to establish proactive risk mitigation strategies. Review incident trends and implement programs that reduce risk exposure and improve safety performance. Talent Development and Organizational Leadership Lead, mentor, and develop business unit leaders, regional leaders, operations leaders, and senior operational personnel. Build succession plans for critical leadership positions throughout the organization. Foster a culture of accountability, collaboration, innovation, and high performance. Support recruiting, retention, workforce planning, and leadership development initiatives. Promote employee engagement and organizational culture across all regions. Operational Excellence Drive standardization of processes, systems, project controls, reporting, and operational best practices. Leverage technology and data analytics to improve decision-making and operational visibility. Establish and monitor key performance indicators (KPIs) across divisions. Lead enterprise initiatives related to productivity improvement, innovation, prefabrication, workforce optimization, and project delivery excellence. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE 10+ years of experience in operations management with a preference for experience in commercial electrical contracting, specialty construction, or related industries. Demonstrated success leading multiple business units, divisions, or regions with significant revenue responsibility. Preference for experience managing large-scale commercial, industrial, mission-critical, and civil construction projects. Proven track record of driving profitable growth, operational improvement, and organizational development. Experience leading senior-level teams in a multi-location environment. Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities Proven ability to develop and implement strategic plans Strong leadership and team management skills Excellent communication and interpersonal skills Ability to work independently and as part of a team Experience in budgeting and financial management Knowledge of supply chain management Ability to solve problems and make decisions quickly Strong analytical and problem-solving skills Ability to work under pressure and meet deadlines Advantages of Working at E-J: Leading Electrical Contracting Organization Nationally Oldest family-owned and operated electrical contractor since 1899 Job training and mentorship Supportive Management Team Rewarding project experience Comprehensive benefits, including medical, dental, vision, and a 401 (k) plan Paid holidays and vacation Merit-Based Bonus History of employment longevity The E-J Group is an Equal Employment Opportunity Employer and ensures equal employment opportunity for all persons without discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, age, disability, marital status, citizenship, or any other characteristic protected by law. Interested in Learning More? 180one has been retained by EJ Electric to manage this search. If interested in learning more about the opportunity, please contact Nicole Brady at 503-699-0184 or via email at nicole@180one.com .
By Greg Togni June 8, 2026
For much of the last decade, executive hiring was closely tied to expansion. Growing companies added new business units, entered new markets, launched digital initiatives, and created leadership roles to support growth. Today, the picture looks markedly different. While demand for senior leadership remains strong, a growing share of executive hiring is being driven by replacement rather than expansion. Across industries, boards and leadership teams are increasingly focused on succession planning, retirement-related transitions, and upgrading leadership capabilities to meet rapidly evolving business demands. In many organizations, the question is no longer, "What new leadership roles do we need?" Instead, it has become, "Do we have the right leaders for the future we are building?" Several converging trends are driving this shift. A Wave of Leadership Turnover Leadership turnover continues to accelerate across public and private companies. According to research cited by Harvard Business Review, CEO succession rates reached 12.5% in 2025, up significantly from 9.8% the prior year. At the same time, more than 2,000 CEO departures were recorded in the United States, reflecting one of the most active succession environments in recent decades. Boards are also becoming more willing to look externally for leadership talent. Recent data show that 44% of CEO appointments among S&P 1500 companies came from outside the organization, a level near a 25-year high. This growing willingness to seek external leadership reflects a broader reality: many organizations believe that the skills required for the next phase of growth may not be fully represented within their current leadership teams. The Retirement Factor Is Becoming Impossible to Ignore Demographics are creating another powerful force behind replacement hiring. Large numbers of Baby Boomers continue to exit the workforce, creating leadership gaps across industries. While retirement timing varies by sector and geography, organizations are increasingly confronting the loss of decades of institutional knowledge and leadership experience. Many companies spent the past several years postponing succession discussions while navigating economic uncertainty, inflation, and labor market disruption. As a result, some organizations are now facing a compressed timeline to identify and develop the next generation of leaders. The challenge extends beyond simply filling vacancies. In many cases, companies are discovering that there are fewer experienced leaders available than expected, particularly in specialized industries where leadership pipelines have not kept pace with retirements. Evidence of these pressures is appearing across both public and private sectors as organizations report increasing difficulty replacing highly experienced senior talent. From Replacement to Upgrade Not all replacement hiring is driven by turnover. An increasingly common scenario involves organizations replacing leaders who are performing adequately but lack the capabilities required for future business needs. Economic uncertainty has made many organizations cautious about adding headcount. Instead of creating new executive positions, boards are asking whether existing leadership structures are optimized for growth, profitability, and transformation. Recruiters and talent advisors report a significant increase in confidential replacement searches, particularly for leadership positions impacted by AI, digital transformation, operational efficiency, and changing customer expectations. Rather than expanding leadership teams, organizations are investing in stronger leadership capability within existing roles. This represents a meaningful shift from previous cycles. Historically, executive hiring often accompanied organizational growth. Today, many leadership searches are designed to improve execution, accelerate transformation, or close capability gaps. AI Is Raising the Leadership Bar Artificial intelligence is emerging as one of the strongest drivers of leadership upgrades. Boards increasingly expect executives to understand not only their functional disciplines but also how AI will reshape business models, workflows, workforce planning, customer engagement, and competitive advantage. Organizations are reassessing leadership teams through a new lens: adaptability. Leaders are being evaluated on their ability to navigate technological disruption, lead workforce transformation, make data-driven decisions, and build organizations capable of operating in a rapidly changing environment. Companies across industries are investing heavily in AI capabilities and adjusting talent strategies accordingly. As a result, many executive searches today are less about filling a vacancy and more about acquiring capabilities that did not exist as leadership requirements even a few years ago. What Corporate Leaders Should Be Thinking About The implications for boards, CEOs, and CHROs are significant. Organizations that treat leadership succession as an occasional event may find themselves competing for scarce talent at precisely the moment they need continuity and stability. Meanwhile, companies that regularly assess leadership capabilities against future business requirements will be better positioned to navigate both retirements and transformation. The most successful organizations are no longer viewing succession planning and executive hiring as separate activities. They are treating both as part of a broader leadership strategy focused on future readiness. The executive hiring market in 2026 remains active, but the underlying motivation has changed. For many organizations, the priority is not adding more leaders. It is ensuring they have the right leaders for what comes next.
More Posts