Interview Bias: How It Happens & How to Avoid It, Part 2

Interview Bias

This article is the second in 180one’s two-part series looking at how your organization can avoid interview bias and improve your hiring processes. To read part one of this series, click here. To learn more about the best practices around Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) during the hiring process click here to read our recent article


Part II

Have you ever felt strongly within the first five minutes of meeting a job candidate whether she or he would be a good fit for the job? We’re social creatures, and it’s human nature to make a quick decision on whether we like someone, based on our own background and beliefs. Likewise, in a business setting, hiring managers can be powerfully and unconsciously influenced by their biases throughout the candidate selection and interview process.


Trying to coach your hiring team to completely let go of bias goes against human nature, but you can guide them on how to be aware of and diminish implicit biases. Then you can put your company resources toward de-biasing hiring procedures rather than mindsets, so that it is a lot harder for personal feelings to influence an objective assessment of the best candidate for the job.


Types of Interview Bias

First, to look at how you can de-bias your interview process, consider the most common types of interview bias you will need to tackle, as found by personnel psychologists and organization researchers:


“Like Me” Bias: When a candidate appears to be similar in style or personality to the hiring manager, and as a result, the hiring manager feels that candidate would be best suited for the job.


Halo/Pitchfork Effect: The Halo Effect happens when one positive characteristic of the candidate influences the entire interview process in favor of the candidate. The Pitchfork Effect happens when one negative characteristic overshadows the candidate’s overall qualifications.

Bias Cartoon

Stereotyping Bias: Our inclination to hold an opinion about how a person will think or act because they’re a certain race, gender, religion or another characteristic.


Nonverbal Bias: When a candidate is assessed in a positive or negative light because of an observed attribute, such as body language or an aspect of physical appearance.


Negative Emphasis Bias: When the interviewer receives one piece of negative information and give it more weight than all the positives about a candidate.


Cultural Noise: The interviewer’s ability, or lack of, to distinguish between a candidate’s answer that is crafted to be more socially acceptable or on-trend rather than revealing their true belief or experience.


Contrast Effect: When a candidate with a stronger presentation style interviews after a weaker-style candidate, the stronger-style candidate may appear more qualified because of the contrast between the two.


(There’s more info on these common biases in Part I of our series, which you can find here.)


In a nutshell, if you think a candidate is or isn’t going to work based on your first reaction or stereotypes, you’re likely to look for reasons to hire or not hire. We find that some of our clients make a judgment based on a candidate’s current or most recent employer, commenting for example that “Their culture is very different than ours and they wouldn’t be a good fit here.”


For example, a candidate may currently be employed in an organization that has a reputation of being slow in decision making, and the hiring organization sees themselves as fast paced decisive. However, just because someone works at a company with a vastly different culture, it doesn’t necessarily mean that the candidate prefers this culture or can only work in that type of culture. The candidate’s current company culture might be a reason why they are looking to make a move.


Yes, these biases stem from human nature, but you can start to neutralize their impact before your candidates even walk through the door. And there’s good reason to make de-biasing a priority – recent studies of diversity in senior-level staffing in a variety of industries have shown definitively that a more diverse workplace is a higher-performing workplace.


For example – in their latest report, “Diversity Matters,” the global management consulting firm McKinsey & Company found that more ethnically diverse companies are 35 percent more likely to outperform their competitors, and that more gender-diverse companies are 15 percent more likely to outperform their competitors.


Strategies to Diminish Interview Bias & Diversify Your Team

You can begin de-biasing your process by readying your hiring committee for their resumé reviews and interviews. Create a preparation plan that highlights how to stay aware of diversity, equity and inclusion throughout the hiring process. That plan could include:


  • Briefing session: Your hiring manager can describe the company’s goals for the position, and how those goals tie to the diversity, equity and inclusion goals of your organization overall.
  • Self-Assessment: “Do I have bias?” can be a hard question to ask yourself, but it’s important to be self aware when participating in the hiring process. You can prepare your hiring team by providing research about implicit bias, and encourage them to do research of their own, such as watching this quick video series about implicit bias created by UCLA’s Office of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion.


A technique we at 180one recommend to mitigate bias is assembling a hiring committee, and picking a diverse team, including members from a variety of ethnicities, gender identities, and age groups who you know work well together. Assign each member or group of members a specific aspect or two of the candidate to focus on. This keeps interview team members in an objective frame of mind about the candidate.


For example, you could assemble a hiring committee of six, and break them into teams of two, which each focusing on two categories:

  • Team 1: Focus on the candidate’s executive leadership skills and business partnering.
  • Team 2: Focus on the candidate’s relatability to company culture and potential for good fit.
  • Team 3: Focus on the candidate’s technical ability to do the job.


With this technique, members of your hiring committee won’t wander into other areas in which there may be unintentional judgments that are not relevant to the job or the candidate’s readiness.


For the next step, personnel psychologists and management consultants recommend blind hiring to remove bias from the process and develop a more diverse candidate pool. You can use a search firm like 180one to prescreen candidate application materials with your hiring goals in mind, so you are not seeing any applicant data that may trigger positive or negative associations before a candidate walks through your door.


When you get to the interview stage, a structured interview that standardizes your questions and the order they are asked will significantly cut back on subjectivity. Personnel psychology research has shown that the more social exchange of an unstructured interview opens up the most opportunities for bias, yet predicts less than 15% percent of ultimate employee performance. You will get a much more objective picture of the candidate by focusing on questions that are skill-based and allow the candidate to explain how he or she would handle situations on the job.


During the interview, consider scoring or taking notes on the answer to each question right after it’s answered. Then after the interviews are completed, the feedback loop among your hiring committee members is very important: they can compare candidate answers side-by-side for each question and rank those answers under the hiring-focus categories your team has set. This systematic comparative evaluation also cuts back greatly on opportunities for biases to guide their impressions.


Companies invest significant time and money to attract the most qualified candidates for executive-level positions, and you want that investment in the hiring process to lead to selecting the most suited person for the job. Diversifying hiring committee assembly, preparing that committee with bias training, structured candidate interviews, and comparative evaluation of answers are smart steps to take in diminishing interview bias and choosing the best talent to serve your organization.

 

Sources cited: Harvard Business Review | McKinsey & Company, Inc.

The 7 Wonders of How to Retain Your Best Talent

By Greg Togni • November 4, 2025
In today’s hyper-competitive business environment, retaining top talent has become one of the most pressing challenges for organizations of all sizes. According to recent data, 76% of private company executives consider talent retention a key to remaining competitive , and for good reason. The cost of replacing an employee can reach up to two times their annual salary, not to mention the loss of institutional knowledge, customer relationships, and team morale that often follows. Yet despite leaders recognizing its importance, 51% of employees are actively looking for or open to a new opportunity . This means that roughly half of your workforce could walk out the door at any time if they find a better offer, stronger culture, or more growth potential. In such a landscape, retention isn’t just an HR function; it’s a strategic imperative. Below, we explore the key drivers of employee retention and how companies can build a culture that keeps their best people engaged, loyal, and thriving. 1. Build a Culture of Recognition and Trust People don’t just work for paychecks—they work for appreciation. Studies show that 71% of employees would be less likely to leave if they were recognized more frequently . Recognition goes far beyond annual awards or performance reviews; it’s about cultivating a daily culture of appreciation. When employees feel that their contributions are valued, they’re more motivated, more loyal, and more invested in the company’s success. But recognition must be genuine and consistent. It can take many forms: a manager’s public praise in a meeting, a peer-to-peer “thank you” program, or even a personalized message from leadership. Recognition reinforces belonging, and belonging drives engagement. However, appreciation alone isn’t enough if leaders fail to act on employee feedback. When organizations solicit feedback but do nothing with it, it creates frustration and mistrust. Employees start to believe leadership doesn’t listen, which erodes morale. Transparency about what’s being done with feedback, whether changes are implemented or not, is essential to maintaining trust and retention. 2. Strengthen Leadership and Management Quality It’s often said that people don’t quit jobs, they quit managers. The data support this: seven out of ten workers who quit their jobs do so because of a bad manager . Poor management can take many forms, micromanagement, lack of communication, inconsistent expectations, or insufficient support. Whatever the cause, bad management destroys engagement faster than almost any other factor. To retain your best talent, invest in developing your leaders. Provide training on emotional intelligence, communication, and conflict resolution. Encourage managers to hold regular one-on-ones that focus on coaching rather than just task management. Good leaders inspire people to stay and grow; bad ones drive them away. Organizations that prioritize leadership development send a clear message: we care about your experience here, not just your output. 3. Make Onboarding an Experience, not a Process The employee experience starts on day one. A strong onboarding program sets the tone for engagement, connection, and retention. Research shows that 69% of employees are more likely to stay for at least three years after a great onboarding experience . That’s a powerful return on investment for something many companies still treat as a checklist exercise. Effective onboarding goes beyond paperwork and orientation. It integrates new hires into the company culture, connects them with mentors, and helps them understand how their role contributes to the organization’s mission. The first 90 days are critical; employees decide whether they see a long-term future with the company based largely on this period. Investing in structured, meaningful onboarding experiences pays dividends in loyalty, productivity, and morale. 4. Offer Continuous Learning and Career Growth In an era of rapid technological change, professional development is not just a perk; it’s a necessity. 94% of employees say they would stay longer if they had more learning opportunities. That statistic should grab every executive’s attention. Employees want to grow, evolve, and feel like they are moving forward in their careers. Creating a culture of continuous learning means offering access to courses, mentorship programs, cross-departmental projects, and leadership pathways. It also means making learning accessible through digital platforms, lunch-and-learns, or sponsorships for certifications. Career stagnation is one of the biggest drivers of turnover. When employees see no path upward, they start looking outward. Companies that invest in developing their people not only improve retention but also future-proof their workforce for tomorrow’s challenges. 5. Align Compensation with Value While culture, recognition, and growth matter deeply, compensation remains a critical factor. Fifty-six percent of employees say compensation is a top reason they would consider leaving . Fair pay isn’t just about keeping up with competitors; it’s about showing employees they are valued. This doesn’t always mean being the highest-paying employer in your market, but it does mean being competitive and transparent. Regular salary benchmarking, performance-based bonuses, and clear communication about pay structures build trust and loyalty. Additionally, benefits play a huge role. Health insurance, retirement contributions, flexible work arrangements, and mental health resources are all part of the total compensation package employees evaluate when deciding whether to stay. 6. Foster a Sense of Purpose and Belonging Employees today are looking for more than just a job; they’re looking for meaning. They want to know if their work has purpose and that their company stands for something beyond profit. This is especially true for younger generations entering the workforce. Creating purpose means connecting daily tasks to the broader mission and impact of the organization. When employees understand how their work contributes to something bigger, whether it’s serving customers, improving communities, or driving innovation, they’re more likely to stay committed and engaged. Belonging also plays a major role. Inclusive cultures where diverse voices are valued foster higher engagement and retention. Employees should feel they can bring their authentic selves to work without fear of judgment or exclusion. 7. Use Data to Drive Retention Strategy Retention isn’t a guessing game; it’s measurable. Use employee engagement surveys, turnover data, and stay interviews to understand why people stay and why they leave. Look for patterns by department, manager, or tenure. Once you identify the drivers of turnover, act quickly. Whether it’s improving communication, adjusting workloads, or rethinking career paths, data-driven decisions allow you to focus resources where they’ll have the greatest impact. Remember: what gets measured gets improved. Retaining top talent isn’t just an HR initiative - it’s a company-wide commitment. From executives to front-line managers, every leader has a role to play in creating an environment where people feel valued, supported, and inspired to stay. In the end, companies that treat employees as their most valuable asset - and act accordingly- will not only retain their best talent but also attract more of it. In a world where skilled workers have more choices than ever, the organizations that win will be those that make people want to stay.

New Opportunity: Chief Financial Officer

By Effie Zimmerman • October 22, 2025
 Chief Financial Officer ABOUT THE COMPANY CRU Data Security Group (CDSG) is a leading innovator and manufacturer of industrial-grade flash storage, secure storage products, and removable secure data solutions. With its OEM partners, CDSG supports security-conscious customers worldwide, including government agencies, military organizations, and corporations of all sizes. The company’s portfolio includes highly secure solid-state drives (SSDs), removable SSDs, disaster-proof storage devices, and forensic investigation tools. These purpose-built solutions are engineered to deliver the highest levels of security, durability, and performance, ensuring mission-critical data is protected whether operating at the edge, in the field, or behind the firewall. In 2025, Seattle-based private equity firm Pike Street Capital made a strategic investment in CDSG to accelerate growth through product innovation and targeted acquisitions. THE ROLE CDSG is seeking an experienced and results-driven Chief Financial Officer (CFO) to lead the financial strategy and execution of their high-growth business. The CFO will play a critical role in enabling both organic and acquisitive growth, optimizing operations, and driving value creation in partnership with the CEO and private equity sponsor. This is a hands-on executive leadership role ideal for a proven financial leader with a track record of operating in dynamic, performance-driven environments. RESPONSIBILITIES Executive & Strategic Leadership Serve as a strategic partner to the CEO and executive team, actively contributing to policy, direction, and long-term planning. Help define and execute the company’s growth strategy in alignment with operational, financial, and market objectives. Drive a high-performance culture through accountability, transparency, and collaboration. Lead by example, setting the tone and culture across the organization. Operate as a player/coach, comfortable building models, developing presentations, and engaging directly in critical business issues. Attract, develop, and retain top-tier financial and operational talent. Lead major business initiatives and projects (e.g., productivity improvement, pricing strategies) with measurable results. Shoulder broad business leadership responsibility, beyond traditional finance functions. Financial Planning & Analysis (FP&A) Own the development and ongoing refinement of annual budgets, monthly forecasts, and long-term financial planning. Track and maintain key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure performance against strategic goals. Conduct hands-on analysis of financial performance, with actionable insights to achieve growth and EBITDA targets. Lead investment analysis and decision support, including customer pricing models and full business case development. Demonstrated expertise in labor cost management and margin improvement strategies. Bring experience across multiple ERP platforms; ERP selection and implementation experience is highly preferred. Accounting & Financial Operations Oversee all accounting and finance functions, ensuring accuracy, integrity, and timeliness of financial information. Prepare and deliver comprehensive financial reporting packages, including monthly P&L, balance sheet, cash flow, and covenant compliance. Ensure all financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and meet internal and external stakeholder requirements. Lead all month-end close activities, including general ledger, balance sheet reconciliations, and overhead allocation. Enhance and scale accounting processes, systems, and internal controls to support company growth. Coordinate the annual audit process, ensuring unqualified audit results. Lead the preparation and management of company-wide budgets, including revenue and capital expenditure planning. Treasury & Working Capital Management Lead cash flow forecasting, management, and decision-making around weekly cash disbursements. Improve the full cash cycle, credit policy, collections, inventory, and payables management. Manage lender relationships and covenant compliance. Use forward-looking cash flow analysis to guide capital structure decisions and working capital strategy. M&A & Private Equity Engagement Collaborate with the leadership team, private equity sponsors on M&A activities. Experience or understanding of value creation planning, reporting, and board-level communication. EDUCATION, EXPERIENCE & SKILLS REQUIRED Bachelor’s degree in finance, accounting, business administration, or a related discipline; CPA and MBA strongly preferred. Extensive experience in senior financial leadership roles, ideally within a private equity-backed or high-growth environment. Deep understanding of financial and operational disciplines, including P&L ownership, balance sheet management, cash flow optimization, and capital allocation. Demonstrated experience in corporate governance, risk management, and regulatory compliance. Proven ability to lead complex negotiations related to financing, vendor agreements, M&A, and commercial terms. Expertise in budgeting, forecasting, financial modeling, and working capital management; prior public accounting experience is a plus. Strong business acumen with the ability to quickly assess new challenges and make sound, data-driven decisions in a dynamic environment. Natural leadership presence with the ability to build trust and credibility across all levels of an organization and with external stakeholders. Resilient under pressure with a disciplined approach to prioritization, execution, and delegation. Exceptional communication skills—both written and verbal—with the ability to clearly articulate financial concepts to non-financial stakeholders. Committed to service excellence, with strong interpersonal skills and a collaborative leadership style. High attention to detail and precision, balanced with the ability to think strategically and see the broader business context. Interested in Learning More? 180one has been retained by CDSG to manage this search. If interested in learning more about the opportunity, please contact Nicole Brady at 180one at: 503.699.0184 / nicole@180one.com .

Rethinking the Org Chart: Why Successful Companies Avoid Overloading Managers

By Greg Togni • October 3, 2025
In today’s business climate, reorganizations have become the norm rather than the exception. Companies shift structure to respond to market changes, streamline costs, adopt new technologies, or realign with strategy. But while the headlines focus on job cuts or new leadership, one critical factor often overlooked in the success or failure of a reorganization is managerial span of control : the number of direct reports assigned to each manager. When companies get this wrong, they risk derailing even the best-planned structural change. When they get it right, the results include faster decision-making, improved employee engagement, and better execution of strategic goals. So how do the most successful companies handle this delicate balance during a reorg? The Pitfalls of Overloading Managers The pressure to do more with less can tempt organizations to increase the number of employees reporting directly to each manager. After all, fewer managers mean lower salary overhead, less bureaucracy, and theoretically, a leaner, faster organization. But research consistently shows that increasing a manager’s span of control beyond a certain point leads to declining effectiveness , both for the manager and their team. According to a comprehensive study by Bain & Company, companies with top-quartile performance in productivity and employee engagement tend to cap manager spans at no more than 7 to 10 direct reports , depending on the complexity of the work and the level of autonomy of the team. Beyond this range, several problems begin to surface: Decreased coaching and development time: With too many direct reports, managers struggle to provide regular feedback or support individual growth. Slower decision-making: Managers become bottlenecks as more team members wait for approvals or guidance. Increased burnout: Overloaded managers report higher levels of stress, disengagement, and turnover. Reduced innovation: Less time for strategic thinking means less opportunity to solve problems creatively or improve team performance. Harvard Business Review echoes this concern, noting that “as spans widen, the average quality of management and leadership drops,” especially in knowledge-driven or high-complexity work environments. Span of Control: One Size Doesn’t Fit All So what’s the right number? The answer depends on context , and smart companies know that not all roles, teams, or business units require the same structure. Key variables include: Task complexity: Teams doing routine, repeatable work (like call centers or transactional processing) can operate effectively with spans as wide as 15-20 direct reports. In contrast, research and development teams often require narrower spans due to higher collaboration and oversight needs. Employee experience: Highly experienced, autonomous employees require less hands-on supervision, allowing for broader spans. Manager capability: Not all managers are equally equipped to handle large teams. Leadership training, experience, and support systems (like team leads or AI tools) can influence optimal span. Organizational culture: Companies with strong cultures of self-management and clear accountability structures may tolerate wider spans without performance drops. A 2023 McKinsey report emphasizes this variability, stating, “Leading companies tailor spans of control by role and level, not by arbitrary benchmarks.” Case in Point: Reorg Success Stories Let’s look at a few organizations that have successfully navigated reorgs by paying close attention to managerial spans: 1. Microsoft During Satya Nadella’s early tenure as CEO, Microsoft underwent a major organizational overhaul to break down silos and improve collaboration. A key part of the strategy was flattening the org , but not indiscriminately. Nadella emphasized “clarity of purpose” and invested heavily in leadership development to ensure managers were ready to handle broader spans only where appropriate. The result? Productivity rose, engagement improved, and innovation accelerated across product teams. 2. Procter & Gamble (P&G) P&G restructured in the early 2010s to reduce costs and improve agility. Rather than simply cutting layers, the company also reassessed manager-to-employee ratios by function. In areas like finance, where standard processes prevail, spans increased. In innovation and marketing roles, they were kept tight to preserve creativity and oversight. The tailored approach helped P&G maintain performance through a major shift. 3. Spotify Famous for its “squad” model, Spotify empowers small autonomous teams with clear leadership support. Managers, often called Chapter Leads, have limited spans to ensure close mentorship and skill development within specific technical domains. This model has supported Spotify’s growth while preserving agility and innovation. Practical Guidance for Leaders Planning a Reorg If your company is considering, or currently navigating, a reorganization, here are five evidence-based principles to keep in mind: 1. Start with the work, not the structure Begin by analyzing the actual tasks teams are responsible for. How complex is the work? How interdependent are the roles? What level of oversight is needed? Design the structure around the needs of the work, not arbitrary span targets. 2. Avoid flattening without a function Flattening layers can reduce costs, but it can also create chaos if not executed thoughtfully. Ensure that wider spans are matched with the right capabilities, tools, and cultural support. 3. Invest in manager readiness If you do decide to widen spans, ensure your managers are trained in time management, delegation, coaching, and the use of technology. Even experienced managers can falter without support. 4. Use data to monitor and adjust Keep track of KPIs like employee engagement, turnover, decision speed, and manager satisfaction post-reorg. These can provide early warning signs if spans are too wide or teams are struggling. 5. Communicate clearly and consistently Structural changes can breed uncertainty. Communicate not just what is changing, but why, and how it will improve the experience for both managers and their teams. Structure Should Enable Strategy A reorganization is not just a reshuffling of boxes on an org chart, it’s an opportunity to realign your workforce with your business goals. But even the most visionary strategy will falter if leaders are overwhelmed, disengaged, or unsupported. As the research shows, successful reorgs pay close attention to the human factor. Avoiding overly wide spans of control is not about bureaucracy; it’s about enabling leaders to lead .
More Posts