How to Conduct an Effective Confidential Search
Psst…. we’re hiring
There are countless reasons why organizations suddenly have open positions. Perhaps rapid growth is cause for a new role, or maybe an individual is promoted or moves within or outside of their organization. These are, for the most part, positive and common reasons that a position needs to be filled, and the search and recruitment process that follows tends to be relatively straightforward. However, when the reasons for an open position are cause for a confidential search, the methods and sequencing of activities can get a bit more complicated, and oftentimes we find that our clients dread this scenario.
When a Confidential Search is the Right Approach
First things first, it needs to be determined if a situation requires a confidential search, or if a traditional search approach can be conducted. We have found there to be three main scenarios that tend to warrant a confidential approach:
- Someone is retiring or transitioning out of their role and the organization wants to minimize the uncertainty with the internal team and related third parties until a successor candidate is identified and secured.
- The role is very strategic, and the organization does not want their competitors or other third parties to be aware of this new position (e.g. upcoming acquisition, new geography or new business unit).
- The incumbent has a performance issue and the organization does not want to risk the incumbent departing before the successor has been secured.
The Drawbacks of Conducting a Confidential Search
While there might be business reasons to conduct a confidential search, they are accompanied with a few drawbacks that impact either the timeliness and/or quality of the search. Not being able to disclose the company to candidates at the beginning of the search tends to result in fewer qualified candidates being interested.
A job is what you do, an organization is why you do it.
The best candidates are selective, and they want to do research on the organization to ensure they are investing their time wisely. Candidates are typically drawn to an organization first, before then being drawn to the job. By not being able to disclose the company, hiring managers find that some great candidates are often reluctant to advance their candidacy.
Another drawback surfaces in the scenario where the incumbent has performance issues and the organization plans to terminate them once a successor is identified. Prospective candidates could easily interpret this as a sign that the hiring organization has an inability to manage and/or communicate with their employees, thus questioning why they would ever put them self in that position. Is that their potential future?
Modifications of the Search Process
Despite the drawbacks a confidential search places on the search process, there are some modifications that can be incorporated to help offset those negative impacts—so don’t be alarmed.
Understanding the role: The front end of the recruitment is the same as in a standard search with respect to gaining an understanding of the need for the role, figuring out how to define success and the creation of any candidate assessment or evaluation templates. These are always tailored for each search, a confidential search being no exception.
Sourcing: The methods which an organization utilizes to identify candidates is the phase of a confidential search that gets impacted the most. Typical practices might involve modifying the sequencing of discussions with a prospective candidate.
- If the organization’s need for a confidential search will expire on a certain date, 180one has found it effective to continue reaching out to candidates in a timely manner, but then to schedule follow up calls with prospective candidates at a time when we can disclose. This approach uses the silent period to at least gauge interest, while not wasting time with detailed conversations until more meaningful information can be shared.
- If the organization’s reasoning for a confidential search is based on a low performing incumbent, the utilization of an ND&A with a prospective candidate, or only disclosing information to a small group of qualified and interested candidates is a good work around.
- Additionally, focusing on sourcing candidates out of the area can help mitigate the internal team or incumbent finding out through their channels that there is a search being conducted.
Job Postings: This one is a bit more obvious, but if an organization relies on job postings, or distributing the position amongst their network, the position description must be scrubbed from any identifiers that could disclose the hiring organization. PRO-TIP: Do not use past position descriptions as they tend to have a similar format, use common vernacular or acronyms that could ultimately leave a fingerprint of the organization. These candidates are smart, and it doesn’t take much to put the pieces together!
Research/Targeting: It is nearly impossible for an internal recruiter to conduct a confidential search without immediately giving away the company’s identity, thus it is imperative that a third party recruiting firm is utilized. A recruiting firm’s arms-length relationship with the hiring organization tends to create enough of a buffer to protect the anonymity of the client, thus the recruiters merely need to eliminate certain talking points that would reveal too much information about the organization.
Conducting an Effective & Efficient Confidential Search
The entire goal of running a confidential search is to protect the organization’s anonymity while identifying the right candidate(s) and maintaining the momentum of the organization’s initiatives, all in a timely manner. It is important for an organization to understand that candidate pools are typically smaller in a confidential search, especially in a tight labor market, but it is not impossible to find a great candidate if the search is setup and thoroughly thought out.
There is no reason that a confidential search needs to be any less effective than a traditional search and leveraging the expertise from those who have the experience in conducting confidential searches could be the most valuable first step of the process.
Ready to hire a retained search firm? Feel free to contact 180one and we’d be happy to assist!
Few decisions carry more weight, or more emotional friction, than upgrading management. Whether in a private equity–backed business or a closely held private company, leaders know the decision matters. They also know it’s uncomfortable. Incumbent executives may have helped close the deal, built the business, or earned deep loyalty from employees and customers. In that context, waiting can feel prudent, even humane. Yet across ownership structures, cycles, and industries, the evidence points in one direction: delaying action on leadership misalignment quietly erodes value long before performance visibly breaks. What the Data Consistently Shows Research across management transitions paints a consistent picture. Roughly half of PE-backed companies replace the CEO within the first two years of ownership, with many changes occurring in the first year. Studies of executive transitions show failure rates between 30% and 40% in the first 18 months, most often driven not by incompetence but by misalignment—on mandate, pace, or priorities. The lesson is not that boards are impatient. It’s that leadership fit matters more than familiarity, and a misfit rarely corrects itself with time. The Most Expensive Period Is After Doubt Sets In By the time a board or ownership group agrees that a leadership upgrade may be needed, value erosion is often already underway. Growth initiatives slow. Decision-making becomes cautious. Reporting grows heavier as leaders explain results instead of driving them. High performers sense uncertainty and begin to disengage. In PE-backed environments, this dynamic plays out faster and with fewer buffers. But private companies experience the same slow bleed, just over a longer horizon. The “One More Quarter” Fallacy “Let’s give it one more quarter” is one of the most expensive sentences in governance. Boards and owners often justify delay by pointing to an initiative in flight, system implementation, or temporary market headwinds. But studies of executive performance show that trajectory matters more than absolute results. If clarity, momentum, and conviction are not improving, time rarely fixes the issue. A common pattern: leadership change is debated for several quarters. When a new executive finally steps in, they make decisive moves within 60 to 90 days, moves that had been discussed, analyzed, and deferred for a year. The opportunity cost of that delay is real, even if it never appears cleanly in the P&L. Missed Windows Are Permanent Losses The most dangerous cost of waiting is not short-term underperformance; it’s a missed opportunity. In PE-backed companies, similar windows appear around add-on acquisitions, operational transformations, or pricing resets. A capable but misaligned leader can miss those windows by moving too slowly or pulling the wrong levers. Once missed, those opportunities rarely reopen on the same terms. Loyalty Is Expensive, But So Is Delay Many delayed leadership changes stem from understandable loyalty: to founders, long-tenured executives, or leaders who were instrumental during diligence or early growth. But fiduciary responsibility ultimately outweighs emotional equity. The most effective boards separate gratitude for past contributions from clarity about future requirements. They also recognize that earlier action is usually kinder. Early transitions allow for controlled narratives, thoughtful role changes, and dignified exits. Late-stage changes tend to feel abrupt, personal, and destabilizing. A Simple Test for Owners and Boards One question cut through most debates: If we were hiring for this role today, knowing what we now know, would we make the same choice? If the answer isn’t an unambiguous yes, delay rarely improves the outcome. Another signal is how leadership discussions consume time. When meetings shift from strategy and growth to coaching, shielding, or compensating for leadership gaps, the decision has often already been made, just not acknowledged. Why Smart Owners Explore the Market Early High-performing PE firms, and increasingly, sophisticated private owners, often explore the executive market before a final decision is reached. This isn’t about undermining management; it’s about sharpening judgment. Seeing the caliber of available talent reframes the question from “Can this work?” to “Is this the best we can do?” In many cases, an external perspective provides clarity faster than another quarter of internal debate. Timing is Everything Upgrading management is never easy. But the evidence, data, deals, and lived experience are clear: indecision is rarely neutral. The organizations that consistently outperform aren’t the ones that change leaders most often. They’re the ones who change them on time. And in a world of compressed timelines, competitive markets, and rising expectations, timing isn’t just a leadership issue; it’s a value creation issue.
General Counsel ABOUT THE COMPANY A-dec is the premium leader in the dental equipment industry, designing and manufacturing products that span dental chairs, lights, handpieces, furniture, air management, infection control, and delivery systems found in dental offices and operatories. With over 1300 employees and headquartered in Newberg, Oregon, A-dec’s familial culture and values have been attributed to their commitment to the Newberg community and its employees through various investments and programs. ABOUT THE POSITION The General Counsel (GC) will manage legal matters for the organization and affiliated entities, including all litigation defense coordination, intellectual property, business development, contracting, unfair trade practices, anti-trust, corporate governance, and the coordination of legal matters managed by outside counsel. GC will provide legal advice to management, provide counsel on negotiating corporate transactions, and prepare related documentation. Provide strong leadership, guidance, and pragmatic business acumen, recognizing the business consequences of legal advice. GC is a strategic and innovative thinker who can develop and articulate a clear understanding of the company’s strategy from all perspectives and find creative solutions to complex legal problems with a strong ability to balance legal and business risk. DUTIES & RESPONSIBILITIES Corporate Governance & Strategy Serve as a trusted legal advisor to the executive leadership team on corporate governance and risk management. Oversee corporate governance matters, including board support, entity management, and compliance with applicable corporate laws. Support business development, joint ventures, and other strategic transactions from due diligence through integration. Board meeting preparation and serves as acting Secretary in Board of Directors’ meetings and prepares all necessary Board and Shareholder documents. Regulatory & Compliance Partner with corporate regulatory leaders to ensure compliance with U.S. and international laws and regulations applicable to medical/dental devices, manufacturing, quality systems, and global distribution. Interface with corporate regulatory leaders to manage regulatory risk and ensure compliance. Develop, implement, and maintain company-wide compliance policies and training programs. Commercial & Contract Management Draft, review, and negotiate a wide range of commercial agreements, including supplier, distributor, licensing, manufacturing, and customer contracts. Support global sales and supply chain operations with practical, business-focused legal guidance. Establish contract standards and processes to improve efficiency and risk management. Intellectual Property Oversee protection, management, and enforcement of the company’s intellectual property portfolio, including patents, trademarks, and trade secrets. Work with internal teams and external counsel on IP strategy aligned with product development and global expansion. Litigation & Risk Management Manage all litigation, disputes, and claims, including product liability and commercial matters. Select and manage outside counsel, controlling costs and ensuring high-quality outcomes. Oversee risk mitigation strategies. Legal Operations Build and lead the legal function, including internal staff and external legal resources. Develop budgets, manage legal spend, and improve legal operations and processes. Foster a culture of ethics, compliance, and sound risk judgment across the organization. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS Knowledge, Skills and Abilities Strong business acumen with the ability to balance legal risk and commercial objectives. Deep understanding of regulatory, compliance, and quality requirements in a manufacturing environment. Excellent negotiation, communication, and leadership skills. Practical, solutions-oriented mindset with high ethical standards. Ability to work collaboratively with business clients and proactively become involved in business initiatives. Ability to interact effectively with associates at all levels in all businesses across North America and in countries where A-dec has a presence. Ability to interface and negotiate with legal representatives at dealers and suppliers. Ability to communicate clearly, concisely, and effectively. Good listening skills. Skilled at working independently and leading critical matters to conclusion with little supervision, while coordinating with other attorneys and stakeholders. Demonstrated ability to quickly establish trust and rapport within A-dec. Strong leadership skills to manage projects and influence decisions, with the ability to be persuasive in reinforcing the best interests of the company. Understands business implications of decisions. Strong analytical, organizational, and time management skills. Travel, including internationally as needed, to perform the duties of the job. Expert legal document drafting and research skills. Education and Experience Requires Juris Doctor (JD) from an accredited law school. Must be a member of the bar in good standing; admission to the Oregon State Bar preferred. 10+ years of legal experience in a relevant law firm or corporate setting. Experience as an Associate, Assistant, or General Counsel is preferred. Experience in medical devices, pharmaceuticals, or other healthcare-related experience is desirable. Experience in a manufacturing business is preferred. Experience in a global business with international distribution is preferred. Interested in Learning More? 180one has been retained by A-dec to manage this search. If interested in learning more about the opportunity, please contact Lisa Heffernan / 971.256.3076/ lisa@180one.com .
Chief Financial Officer ABOUT THE COMPANY Superior Duct Fabrication is a market-leading fabricator of highly technical commercial ducting and specialty HVAC products, serving mission-critical end markets such as data centers, semiconductor manufacturing, healthcare, higher education, and industrial facilities. Founded in 2002 and headquartered in Pomona, CA, Superior operates out of five strategic manufacturing sites across the Western U.S. and Ohio, with a deeply experienced union workforce, vertically integrated operations, and a reputation for quality, speed, and reliability. In 2025, Seattle-based private equity firm Pike Street Capital made a platform investment in Superior to accelerate growth through geographic expansion, product innovation, and targeted acquisitions. With a strong leadership team, trusted customer relationships, and increasing demand for sophisticated air handling solutions, Superior is positioned for rapid, scalable growth. THE ROLE Superior is seeking an experienced and results-driven Chief Financial Officer (CFO) to lead the financial strategy and execution of its private equity-backed, high-growth business. The CFO will play a critical role in enabling both organic and acquisitive growth, optimizing operations, and driving value creation in partnership with the CEO, President, and private equity sponsor. This is a hands-on executive leadership role ideal for a proven financial leader with deep manufacturing expertise and a track record of operating in dynamic, performance-driven environments. RESPONSIBILITIES Executive & Strategic Leadership Serve as a strategic partner to the CEO and executive team, actively contributing to policy, direction, and long-term planning. Help define and execute the company’s growth strategy in alignment with operational, financial, and market objectives. Drive a high-performance culture through accountability, transparency, and collaboration. Lead by example, setting the tone and culture across the organization. Operate as a player/coach—comfortable building models, developing presentations, and engaging directly in critical business issues. Attract, develop, and retain top-tier financial and operational talent. Lead major business initiatives and projects (e.g., productivity improvement, pricing strategies) with measurable results. Shoulder broad business leadership responsibility, beyond traditional finance functions. Financial Planning & Analysis (FP&A) Own the development and ongoing refinement of annual budgets, monthly forecasts, and long-term financial planning. Track and maintain key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure performance against strategic goals. Conduct hands-on analysis of financial performance, with actionable insights to achieve growth and EBITDA targets. Lead investment analysis and decision support—including customer pricing models and full business case development. Demonstrated expertise in labor cost management and margin improvement strategies. Bring experience across multiple ERP platforms; ERP selection and implementation experience is highly preferred. Accounting & Financial Operations Oversee all accounting and finance functions, ensuring accuracy, integrity, and timeliness of financial information. Prepare and deliver comprehensive financial reporting packages, including monthly P&L, balance sheet, cash flow, and covenant compliance. Ensure all financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and meet internal and external stakeholder requirements. Lead all month-end close activities, including general ledger, balance sheet reconciliations, and overhead allocation. Enhance and scale accounting processes, systems, and internal controls to support company growth. Coordinate the annual audit process, ensuring unqualified audit results. Lead the preparation and management of company-wide budgets, including revenue and capital expenditure planning. Treasury & Working Capital Management Lead cash flow forecasting, management, and decision-making around weekly cash disbursements. Improve the full cash cycle—credit policy, collections, inventory, and payables management. Manage lender relationships and covenant compliance. Use forward-looking cash flow analysis to guide capital structure decisions and working capital strategy. M&A & Private Equity Engagement Collaborate with the leadership team and private equity sponsors on M&A add-on strategies and roll-up execution. Experience or understanding of value creation planning, reporting, and board-level communication. QUALIFICATIONS Bachelor’s degree in Finance, Accounting, Business Administration, or a related discipline; CPA and MBA strongly preferred. Extensive experience in senior financial leadership roles, ideally within a private equity-backed or high-growth manufacturing environment. Deep understanding of financial and operational disciplines, including P&L ownership, balance sheet management, cash flow optimization, and capital allocation. Demonstrated experience in corporate governance, risk management, and regulatory compliance. Proven ability to lead complex negotiations related to financing, vendor agreements, M&A, and commercial terms. Expertise in budgeting, forecasting, financial modeling, and working capital management; prior public accounting experience is a plus. Strong business acumen with the ability to quickly assess new challenges and make sound, data-driven decisions in a dynamic environment. Natural leadership presence with the ability to build trust and credibility across all levels of an organization and with external stakeholders. Resilient under pressure with a disciplined approach to prioritization, execution, and delegation. Exceptional communication skills—both written and verbal—with the ability to clearly articulate financial concepts to non-financial stakeholders. Committed to service excellence, with strong interpersonal skills and a collaborative leadership style. High attention to detail and precision, balanced with the ability to think strategically and see the broader business context. Interested in Learning More? 180one has been retained by Superior Duct Fabrication to manage this search. If interested in learning more about the opportunity, please contact Tom Haley /503.334.1350/ tom@180one.com .
