Top Five Pre-Employment Personality Tests (and What They Reveal About Job Candidates)

If you’ve ever conducted a candidate search or hired anyone, you know that there is no magic wand that can guarantee you’ll make the right decisions or that everyone you hire will click into place like a well-cut jigsaw puzzle piece. As the geographic boundaries and technological limitations that once defined hiring fall away, you have a potentially greater candidate pool than ever, with more tools at your disposal and endless professional research articles to guide you. All our innovations and increased options are supposed to make things easier, aren’t they? But sometimes hiring seems more complex and difficult than ever.

 

Enter the pre-employment personality test – personality inventories and screenings that help you learn more than ever before about your job candidates. A résumé reveals experience and skills, but what about the ineffable “cultural fit” and the alignment of values that are important to your company? What about personality factors that will make someone a great addition to an existing department or team? Or the best person to create an entirely new division within your company? References can help, as can interviews, but the idea of screening dozens of candidates early in the hiring process with a simple test is tantalizing for busy HR departments, hiring managers, and CEOs.

 

Pre-Employment Personality Tests for Hiring

Most of the pre-employment tests commonly used during the hiring process are personality inventories that are intended to reveal aspects of character, temperament, and work-related factors such as leadership, collaboration, and communication styles. Some hiring tests look at cognitive functions and processing speed. 

 

The most famous personality test, Myers-Briggs, was developed specifically for use in HR departments, not for hiring, but for job placement and career development. This test is still widely used as originally intended, though increasingly in hiring as well. Other tests, such as the Wonderlic, were created as a hiring tool and have added significantly to the pre-hire personality test landscape.

 

Having data from a pre-employment test can support the interview process, as long as the hiring team is careful not to let personal feelings about personality types cloud their objectivity.


Top Five Pre-Employment Tests and What They Look For

Five of the most popular personality tests for employers are the Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI), the DISC assessment, Wonderlic Personnel Test (WPT), the Clifton StrengthsFinder, and Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI).


  1. Hogan Personality Inventory – According to the Hogan website, the HPI “describes normal, or bright-side, personality,” revealing information about people when they are at their best. The five areas of focus are adjustment (emotional stability), openness to experience, sociability (level of extraversion), likeability (agreeableness), and conscientiousness. The HPI was created to predict job performance and they recommend its use in hiring, leadership development, and succession planning. Advertised as “the science of personality,” the HPI seeks to rapidly quantify aspects of human nature previously discernable only with the familiarity developed over time.
  2. DISC Assessment – The letters in the name represent four personality indicators: dominance, influence, steadiness, and compliance (or conscientiousness), which blend and balance uniquely for every person. (Interesting fact: these same qualities were identified as the four humors by Hippocrates in c. 400 BCE.) Scoring the DISC Assessment involves plotting test-takers’ answers on a graph to determine the relative weight of each aspect of the personality. Employers use these results to assess how well employees will interact as a team, manage, and communicate. Knowing their own and their colleagues’ DISC type also helps team members build effective work and customer relationships.
  3. Wonderlic Personnel Test – The Wonderlic assessment is more of a cognitive ability test than a personality test. Unlike other tests on this list, the WPT is a standardized, timed test of general intellectual ability used specifically for hiring purposes. It is promoted as a test that can reduce employee turnover by correctly identifying the best candidates prior to hiring, based on their motivation, processing speed, and cognitive strengths.
  4. Clifton StrengthsFinder – The StrengthsFinder assesses behaviors and patterns of thought, categorizing them into themes. The 34 themes fall into four overarching categories: executing (e.g. achievement, consistency, and focus), influencing (e.g. competition, self-assurance, and command), relationship building (e.g. adaptability, positivity, and empathy), and strategic thinking (e.g. analytical, futuristic, and learning). Initially intended as a team-building tool, StrengthsFinder is being used to support hiring, specifically to discover how a candidate’s strengths work together and sync with the strengths of the team.
  5. Myers-Briggs Type Indicator – Probably the most well-known personality assessment, it is also the most widely used in hiring. Test-takers fall into one of 16 personality types, indicated by the combination of four either/or pairs or groupings: introverted/extroverted, intuitive/sensing, feeling/thinking, and judging/perceiving. This test is helpful to both potential candidates and businesses seeking to hire. A MBTI personality type reveals what kind of career and work environment suits the candidate, and whether a candidate will align with workplace culture, job requirements, and expectations. When using Myers-Briggs for hiring, businesses are looking for how and in what capacity an individual will fit best.


Test to Hire – A Strategic Piece of Smart Recruitment

Personality tests for hiring are becoming increasingly common. These tools benefit both candidate and company by making it possible to begin the new relationship based on transparency about strengths and areas of challenge, and encouraging honesty on both sides.  


A personality test can:

  • Paint a good picture of a candidate to reveal cultural fit
  • Show managers how a potential hire would fit and interact with the existing team
  • Encourage honesty in the interviewing process since these assessments do not have right or wrong answers
  • Help recruiters decide between two candidates with similar skills and experience
  • Encourage authentic job objectives for new hires based on what aligns with the strengths and weaknesses revealed by the test
  • Reveal ideal placement within a company, division, or team


There are pitfalls to be aware of. For example, when using a personality test for employee hiring:  

  • Candidates may feel vulnerable to judgement about qualities and traits they have no control over.
  • You could screen out candidates who would actually be good hires.
  • The results may be flawed if the test-taker tries to anticipate desired answers rather than responding honestly.
  • The process may raise legal red flags around bias. These can be avoided as long as you can show the need for this kind of assessment and that you have not discriminated against anyone based on results.


Bottom Line

When pre-employment testing is conducted thoughtfully, these assessments can help businesses avoid discrimination in hiring, reduce turnover, increase loyalty, and recognize candidates who will align with the company’s culture, perform well, and find job satisfaction.


When looking for personality tests for employees and recruits, remember to determine what you want from the test, research your options thoroughly, and approach the process with complete transparency. 

By Greg Togni July 29, 2025
When it comes to picking a new CEO, most boards reach for the usual suspects: executives with deep industry experience, often from within the same company or sector. That approach can feel safe, familiar candidates, known resumes, and minimal learning curves. But sometimes, playing it safe is the riskiest move of all. Two bold CEO appointments, Lou Gerstner at IBM in 1993 and Luca de Meo at Kering (home to Gucci, Saint Laurent, and Balenciaga) in 2025, offer compelling lessons in why bringing in an outsider can not only revitalize a struggling company but completely redefine its future. When a company is facing a critical inflection point, whether due to market shifts, internal stagnation, or a crisis of identity, looking beyond the usual talent pool may be exactly what’s needed. The IBM Pivot: Why the Best Choice Isn’t Always the Obvious One When IBM was on the brink of collapse in the early 1990s, the board had every reason to hire a tech industry insider. The company’s mainframe business was declining, and pundits believed the only way forward was to break it apart. The business media circled around technologists like John Sculley (Apple), Ben Rosen (Compaq), and George Fisher (Motorola) as obvious successors for IBM. It seemed clear: IBM needed someone with computer experience. Instead, the board chose Lou Gerstner , a marketing-focused executive with no background in tech. He had led American Express but had never worked at a tech firm. To most, it seemed like a wild bet. But Gerstner had what IBM truly needed: a clear-eyed view of business fundamentals, customer orientation, and the courage to challenge entrenched thinking. Within weeks, he diagnosed IBM’s core problem - not a dying mainframe business, but a bloated cost structure and poor pricing strategy. He slashed costs, dropped prices, and pivoted the company toward software and services. The result: IBM swung from an $8 billion loss to a $3 billion profit in under two years. The stock doubled in less than three. The takeaway? Gerstner succeeded not because he understood technology better than the insiders, but because he saw the business more clearly. His outsider lens became his greatest asset. Kering’s Gamble: When a Fashion House Needs a Fixer Fast-forward to 2025. The luxury giant Kering , home to Gucci, Saint Laurent, and Balenciaga, is flailing. Once a cultural powerhouse, the company has lost over 60% of its market value in two years. Gen Z is turning away. Investors are panicking. Gucci, the group’s crown jewel, has lost its sparkle. Leadership is uncertain. The traditional luxury playbook isn’t working. Enter Luca de Meo , a car executive. Best known for his turnaround successes at Fiat, SEAT, Volkswagen, and most recently Renault, de Meo is a brand strategist, not a fashion insider. But in an unexpected move, Kering’s longtime CEO François-Henri Pinault tapped him as his successor. To some, the decision was shocking. To others, it was exactly what Kering needed. Like Gerstner, de Meo is a seasoned operator with a history of revitalizing stagnant brands. He brought the Fiat 500 back to life. He revived Renault’s design appeal. And, importantly, he understands how to manage complexity at scale, just like a fashion conglomerate demand. Pinault explained the decision simply: “His experience at the helm of an international listed group, his sharp understanding of brands, and his sense of a strong and respectful corporate culture convinced me that he is the leader I was looking for.” In other words, Kering isn’t betting on fashion expertise. It’s betting on vision, brand building, and courage , qualities that transcend sectors. What Great Boards Understand About CEO Selection These two stories - IBM in 1993 and Kering in 2025 - share a deeper lesson about board behavior: great boards don’t just look for experience. They look for fit, capability , and contextual leadership . According to governance experts, the best board members do four things related to CEO selection that others often overlook: Clarify essential qualities : They define the two or three critical capabilities required to lead the company now , not a generic list of leadership traits. Stay open-minded : They don’t default to insiders or industry lifers. They consider external candidates who might bring unconventional strengths. Understand true fit : They go deep to match the candidate’s strengths to the business’s unique challenges - not just resume credentials. Accept imperfections : No candidate is perfect. Great boards don’t let minor gaps outweigh major potential. The IBM board, for example, didn’t get fixated on Gerstner’s lack of tech experience. They focused on his customer acumen, strategic thinking, and execution muscle . Kering is doing the same with de Meo: prioritizing brand vision and organizational agility over fashion-world familiarity. Why Outsiders Sometimes Make the Best Insiders There’s a myth that only someone “from the industry” can understand a company’s product or sector. But often, industry veterans are too close to the way things have always been done . They bring assumptions, biases, and sometimes too much reverence for tradition. Outsiders, on the other hand, are unencumbered. They ask disruptive questions. They bring fresh playbooks. They’re more willing to cut sacred cows or challenge failing strategies. And when paired with a strong leadership team that fills in any gaps, they can create transformative results. In both IBM and Kering’s case, their challenges weren’t about industry-specific knowledge. They were about strategic misalignment, outdated business models, and fading relevance. And those are problems a great leader, regardless of background, can solve . So, When Should You Look Outside? Hiring an outsider isn’t always the right call. But it can be the smartest one in situations like: An identity crisis (like Kering): when the company no longer knows who it is or how to connect with a new generation of consumers. A deep turnaround (like IBM): when the internal culture is stuck and bold change is needed. A strategic pivot : when the business must evolve quickly, and current leadership lacks the skills or courage to get there. A stagnant succession pool : when the internal candidates reflect the past more than the future. Bold Moves Create New Futures Both Lou Gerstner and Luca de Meo walked into the industries they weren’t born in. They remind us that leadership is less about where you come from, and more about how you think, act, and lead. Boards that have the courage to look outside their industry not only to widen the talent pool - but they also give their companies the best shot at meaningful transformation. In moments of crisis or reinvention, you don’t need more of the same. You need someone who sees things differently and has the guts to act on it.
July 14, 2025
 Vice President Operations & Purchasing About the Company Wilmar is a leading supplier of hand tools and equipment to major retailers across North America. With a focus on quality, value, and service, Wilmar delivers a wide assortment of automotive, industrial, and home repair tools to customers ranging from big-box retailers to specialty distributors. The company has a strong global sourcing operation and a warehouse network supporting a diverse and fast-moving product catalog. Wilmar is backed by Rainier Partners, a growth-focused private equity firm committed to building operational capabilities, improving margins, and supporting long-term value creation. Rainier’s investment is helping accelerate Wilmar’s growth in additional product categories, end markets, and geographies, while preserving the Company’s unique culture and customer focus. About the Role The Vice President of Operations and Purchasing is responsible for driving operational performance across Wilmar’s warehouse, purchasing, and facilities functions. This leader will ensure the company’s distribution operations are efficient, accountable, and aligned with broader business goals. The ideal candidate brings a deep background in global sourcing, warehouse operations, and lean methodologies, combined with the leadership skills to build a high-performing team. The VP of Operations will report directly to the CEO and work closely with the executive team. They will oversee key areas including warehouse management, purchasing strategy, supplier performance, inventory control, safety, and facilities management. This is a hands-on leadership role requiring both strategic insight and executional follow-through. Principal Accountabilities Are: Operational Execution Lead all aspects of warehouse and distribution operations across multiple shifts, with clear accountability for productivity, accuracy, on-time delivery, and safety metrics. Ensure WMS and forecasting tools are fully leveraged to improve planning, execution, and visibility. Drive continuous improvement through lean methodologies, root cause problem-solving, and frontline engagement. Strengthen shift handoffs, floor discipline, and daily performance management. Purchasing & Sourcing Leadership Direct the Purchasing function through a Director of Purchasing and team, ensuring accurate forecasting, supplier performance, and cost optimization. Oversee global sourcing decisions, balancing quality, cost, lead time, and working capital implications. Serve as a strategic negotiator for key supplier relationships and escalation points. Develop sourcing strategies that improve inventory turns and reduce excess and obsolete stock. People Leadership & Culture Build a strong leadership bench across operations and purchasing; provide clarity, accountability, and coaching to direct reports. Evaluate and evolve the existing leadership team to meet current and future needs. Lead culture change with a focus on urgency, ownership, accountability, and safety. Set a high bar for behavior and performance and follow through on underperformance with clarity and professionalism. Data-Driven Management Use systems (WMS, HRIS, Excel) and visual management tools to drive accountability and improve execution. Develop and report on key performance indicators across operations and purchasing. Establish practical, actionable KPIs that align with business priorities and PE partner expectations. Cross-Functional & Financial Acumen Work in partnership with Sales, Finance, ECommerce, and HR to ensure operational decisions support broader business objectives. Translate business strategy into operational execution plans that impact the P&L. Balance tradeoffs between cost, service, and operational risk with clarity and foresight. Ideal Candidate Profile: 10+ years of leadership experience in a high-volume distribution or logistics environment, ideally within a global sourcing and retail supply chain context. Proven success implementing lean practices and continuous improvement initiatives. Demonstrated ability to lead culture change and build strong leadership teams. High comfort level with data and operational systems; able to translate insight into action. Strong cross-functional collaborator who understands how operational decisions impact financial results. Interested in Learning More? 180one has been retained by Wilmar to manage this search. If interested in learning more about the opportunity, please contact Tom Haley / 503-334-1350 /  tom@180one.com 
By Greg Togni July 2, 2025
How the Youngest Team in the NBA Won a Championship, and What It Teaches Companies About Rethinking Experience.  In one of the most remarkable and inspiring seasons in recent sports history, the youngest team in the NBA defied all odds and clinched the championship title. Even more remarkable was that the Thunder were the youngest No. 1 seed in NBA history. Without the weight of veteran stars or a legacy of experience to lean on, this squad demonstrated that youth, agility, and fearless innovation could overcome the status quo. This isn’t a fluke. It’s the result of a deliberate, long–term vision, drafting and developing young talent, investing in player development, and creating a culture that prizes collaboration and growth over seniority. Their journey offers more than just a great sports story; it challenges the way companies view experience and value within their teams. The Traditional View: Experience as a Default Proxy for Value For decades, most organizations have equated years of experience with effectiveness. When hiring senior leaders, companies often use tenure as a key filter. Promotions frequently go to those who have "put in the time." And while experience certainly brings value - especially in decision-making, risk assessment, and stakeholder management - it should no longer be treated as the only or best predictor of future success. The Thunder’s 2025 title flipped that thinking on its head. They didn’t win because they had a deep bench of battle-hardened veterans. Their victory reminds us that in fast-moving environments, potential often outperforms pedigree. The Business Parallel: Rethinking the Experience Premium In corporate environments, experience has long been equated with value. Resumes laden with years of service and past roles often carry more weight than fresh ideas or untested energy. While experience can bring insight and stability, over-reliance on it can lead to stagnation. The NBA championship victory of this young team disrupts that thinking. It underscores a powerful idea: in rapidly changing environments, adaptability, curiosity, and the ability to learn fast can be more impactful than tenure. Companies today operate in a world that’s evolving faster than ever. Technology, consumer behavior, and market dynamics shift constantly. In such a climate, organizations that prize agility and fresh thinking often outperform those clinging to traditional hierarchies and outdated assumptions. Experience Is Still Valuable- But It’s Not Everything This isn’t a dismissal of experience. Seasoned professionals bring wisdom, historical context, and leadership that’s often critical. Just as a team might need a veteran presence in the locker room, companies benefit from experienced leaders who can guide and mentor. Similarly, companies should build environments where experience and youth are complementary, not hierarchical. That means creating mixed-age teams, mentorship programs that go both ways (reverse mentoring), and decision-making processes that value ideas over job titles. Cultural Transformation Begins at the Top For this kind of transformation to occur in business, leadership must challenge their own biases. Hiring practices, promotion pathways, and meeting dynamics often default to favoring experience over potential. To change this: Redefine Value Metrics : Shift from measuring success solely by tenure or past accomplishments to include adaptability, innovation, and team impact. Empower the Young : Give younger employees meaningful projects and leadership opportunities. Let them prove what they can do, not just what they’ve done. Encourage Risk-Taking : Just as the young NBA team took bold shots and played an unpredictable game, companies should reward intelligent risk-taking rather than punishing failure. Foster Intergenerational Collaboration : Combine the best of both worlds—pair youthful energy with seasoned insight for more balanced, resilient teams. The Future Belongs to the Fearless The youngest NBA team’s victory wasn’t just a basketball achievement; it was a cultural statement. It challenged the myth that experience is the ultimate determinant of success and showed the power of trust, teamwork, and youthful fearlessness. For businesses watching from the sidelines, the lesson is clear: if you want to build a championship organization, don’t just look at the old playbook. Cultivate fresh energy, bold thinking, and dynamic execution that youth can bring. Create space for new voices to rise. Experience will always have its place, but in the new era of work, potential might just be the most valuable asset of all.
More Posts